> We don't have consensus. We're deadlocked and we're not getting > sufficient input from the working group to break the deadlock.
Well, yeah, that's why you get paid the big bucks, right? :) > Paul and I can make a decision on the particular question that's a problem but > it probably means an appeal and further delay. That's the process. > Frankly, this working group was chartered under the assumption that the > goal was detection, not prevention. That's my perception as well. Is there anyone who thinks prevention was part of the scope? _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
