On 3/9/17 1:20 PM, Jeremy Rowley wrote: > I don't think there's weak interest in redaction. I think most people are > stumped on how to move forward. Given the discussions on the Google CT policy > list and CAB Form (and the current Symantec practice of redacting SAN > information), it's a huge topic. The question is how do we progress towards > consensus when there are such polar view points.
Fair enough. One problem has been that the proposals have been fairly unstable, in the sense that they change/develop fairly rapidly. One thing that would be helpful would be a summary of each proposal, with technical tradeoffs, that might be useful as a basis for discussion. Also, if someone else wants time on the agenda on this topic they should let us know. Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
