trans  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Trans] [trans] #60 (rfc6962-bis): The number of redacted labels should be revealed in the Precertificate trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #22 (rfc6962-bis): Explain why there are three delivery mechanisms for SCTs trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #19 (rfc6962-bis): Rejig API for efficiency/correctness trans issue tracker
• [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Santosh Chokhani
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Melinda Shore
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Ben Laurie
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Ben Laurie
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #59 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify STH versioning trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #35 (rfc6962-bis): server SCT transmission restriction is misstated trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #13 (rfc6962-bis): Deal with server farm skew trans issue tracker
• [Trans] [trans] #58 (rfc6962-bis): Maximise number of STH's published per time unit trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #58 (rfc6962-bis): Stipulate a maximum number of STH's published per time unit (was: Maximise number of STH's published per time unit) trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #58 (rfc6962-bis): Limit the number of STH's allowed to be published per time unit (was: Stipulate a maximum number of STH's published per time unit) trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #58 (rfc6962-bis): Limit the number of STH's allowed to be published per time unit trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #58 (rfc6962-bis): Limit the number of STH's allowed to be published per time unit trans issue tracker
• [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-05.txt internet-drafts
• [Trans] [trans] #57 (client-behavior): Clients MUST NOT match the redaction label with a "*" label trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #57 (client-behavior): Clients MUST NOT match the redaction label with a "*" label trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #57 (client-behavior): Clients MUST NOT match the redaction label with a "*" label trans issue tracker
• [Trans] [trans] #56 (rfc6962-bis): "*" domain labels MUST NOT be redacted trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #56 (rfc6962-bis): "*" domain labels MUST NOT be redacted trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #56 (rfc6962-bis): "*" domain labels MUST NOT be redacted trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #56 (rfc6962-bis): "*" domain labels MUST NOT be redacted trans issue tracker
• [Trans] sorry about the formatting problem for the attack taxonomy outline Stephen Kent
• [Trans] updated attack analysis Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Santosh Chokhani
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Santosh Chokhani
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Ben Laurie
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Karen Seo
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] updated attack analysis Stephen Kent
• [Trans] Addendum Melinda Shore
  • Re: [Trans] Addendum Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] Addendum Eran Messeri
  • Re: [Trans] Addendum Stephen Kent
• [Trans] Recent issue tracker activity Melinda Shore
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #8 (rfc6962-bis): Need a way to obtain Merkle proofs for a batch for certificates around the SCT timestamp trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #43 (rfc6962-bis): key rollover trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #39 (client-behavior): Monitor behavior trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #21 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify signature checking purpose and mechanism trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #21 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify signature checking purpose and mechanism trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #21 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify signature checking purpose and mechanism trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #17 (rfc6962-bis): Add advice on CNs trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #45 (rfc6962-bis): Incorporate RFC6962 errata trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #38 (client-behavior): Client Behavior: A separate document for specifying client behavior trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #15 (client-behavior): Client behaviour specification needed trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #40 (rfc6962-bis): Auditor behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #40 (rfc6962-bis): Auditor behavior trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #37 (rfc6962-bis): client gossping trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #37 (rfc6962-bis): client gossping trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #37 (rfc6962-bis): client gossping trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #31 (rfc6962-bis): incremental deployment and client behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #31 (rfc6962-bis): incremental deployment and client behavior trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #31 (rfc6962-bis): incremental deployment and client behavior trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #42 (rfc6962-bis): redacted cert dangers trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #42 (rfc6962-bis): redacted cert dangers trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #42 (rfc6962-bis): redacted cert dangers trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #42 (rfc6962-bis): redacted cert dangers trans issue tracker
• [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks trans issue tracker
  • [Trans] Fwd: Re: [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks Melinda Shore
  • Re: [Trans] Fwd: Re: [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks Melinda Shore
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #55 (rfc6962-bis): Security Considerations: Describe the implications of clients *not* doing certain optional checks trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #32 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm needed for client checks of SCT trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #32 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm needed for client checks of SCT trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #15 (rfc6962-bis): Client behaviour specification needed trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #15 (rfc6962-bis): Client behaviour specification needed trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #38 (rfc6962-bis): Client Behavior: A separate document for specifying client behavior trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #38 (rfc6962-bis): Client Behavior: A separate document for specifying client behavior (was: client behavior) trans issue tracker
• [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Jeremy Rowley
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Jeremy Rowley
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Scott R. Corzine
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Salz, Rich
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Peter Bowen
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Jeremy Rowley
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Jeremy Rowley
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Jeremy Rowley
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Peter Bowen
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Jeremy Rowley
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Peter Bowen
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Gervase Markham
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Peter Bowen
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Stephen Farrell
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Gervase Markham
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Peter Bowen
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Watson Ladd
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Peter Bowen
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction Daniel Kahn Gillmor
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #54 (rfc6962-bis): Simplify name redaction trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS Extension trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS Extension trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS Extension trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #44 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificates SHOULD NOT be submitted to add-chain trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #26 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificates: Find alternative format to X.509 trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #26 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificates: Find alternative format to X.509 trans issue tracker
• [Trans] TLS server with SCTs in stapled OCSP responses ? Fabrice Gautier
  • Re: [Trans] TLS server with SCTs in stapled OCSP responses ? Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] TLS server with SCTs in stapled OCSP responses ? Fabrice Gautier
• [Trans] SCT encoding Melinda Shore
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Paul Wouters
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] SCT encoding Stephen Kent
• [Trans] IETF-91 draft minutes posted Paul Wouters
• [Trans] [trans] #53 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify log entry ordering requirements trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #53 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify log entry ordering requirements trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #53 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify log entry ordering requirements trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #53 (rfc6962-bis): Clarify log entry ordering requirements trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #24 (rfc6962-bis): Add a section about log metadata trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #24 (rfc6962-bis): Add a section about log metadata trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #24 (rfc6962-bis): Add a section about log metadata trans issue tracker
  • Re: [Trans] [trans] #24 (rfc6962-bis): Add a section about log metadata trans issue tracker
• Re: [Trans] [trans] #30 (rfc6962-bis): Publish MMD as log metadata trans issue tracker
• [Trans] Log servers by Feb 2015? Salz, Rich
  • Re: [Trans] Log servers by Feb 2015? Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] Log servers by Feb 2015? Salz, Rich
  • Re: [Trans] Log servers by Feb 2015? Rob Stradling
  • Re: [Trans] Log servers by Feb 2015? Salz, Rich
  • Re: [Trans] Log servers by Feb 2015? Matt Palmer
• [Trans] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-trans-ct-dnssec-00.txt Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)
• [Trans] FW: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-trans-ct-binary-codes-00.txt Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)
• [Trans] Gossip drafts Melinda Shore
  • Re: [Trans] Gossip drafts Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [Trans] Gossip drafts Dmitry Belyavsky
  • Re: [Trans] Gossip drafts Linus Nordberg
• [Trans] Fwd: Precertificate format Erwann Abalea
  • Re: [Trans] Fwd: Precertificate format Ben Laurie
• [Trans] IETF schedule Melinda Shore
• [Trans] Certificate verification Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Ben Laurie
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Paul Wouters
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Matt Palmer
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Stephen Kent
  • Re: [Trans] Certificate verification Matt Palmer
• [Trans] attack analysis, revised Stephen Kent

• Earlier messages
• Later messages