On 3/15/17 12:29 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > I am not following this work, but this and the original RFC 6962 both > run afoul of the (good) guidance in RFC 7320. > > Has the working group solicited feedback from the HTTP community on > the use of HTTP in this protocol?
No, we haven't. For what it's worth, 6962 reflects implementation and deployment prior to CT having been brought to the IETF for standardization, so any concerns regarding URL syntax or HTTP transport in the work being done by this working group are necessarily limited to the -bis and related documents. To be honest, I'm personally not convinced of the applicability of 7320 in this case but if there's a specific problem it does need to be discussed. Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
