On 4/7/17 1:05 AM, Eran Messeri wrote: > Instead, we could: > (1) Clarify why BCP 190 may not apply here (based on experience > deploying V1 logs) > (2) Remove the 'ct/v2' portion from all the URIs. > > Any preferences? Mine would be for (2), but it's not a strong preference.
I think that in general, when there's a deviation from a BCP it's a good idea to document why it's inapplicable - the question is very likely to come up at some point during the review process. I don't think that removing the ct/v2 portion would be sufficient to resolve the conflict with BCP 190, although it may be desirable for other reasons. Melinda
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
