On 10/09/2019 00:07, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 9/5/19 2:24 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: >> On 8/30/19 2:54 PM, Rob Stradling wrote: >>> Therefore, and given that Adam has cleared his DISCUSS on this matter, I >>> propose to cancel >>> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/311 and to >>> revert the URL changes that were introduced by 6962bis-32. >> This sounds good to me. > > In the absence of any additional comments, and given existing > working group consensus on the version being reverted to, let's > go ahead and make this so.
I've prepared a PR for this: https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/310 Do we also need to add some text to 6962-bis to justify why we're not adhering to BCP190? Or is this not necessary? -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist Email: [email protected] Bradford, UK Office: +441274024707 Sectigo Limited This message and any files associated with it may contain legally privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it immediately. _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
