On 11/09/2019 11:22, Rob Stradling wrote: > On 11/09/2019 11:20, Rob Stradling wrote: >> On 10/09/2019 00:07, Melinda Shore wrote: >>> On 9/5/19 2:24 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: >>>> On 8/30/19 2:54 PM, Rob Stradling wrote: >>>>> Therefore, and given that Adam has cleared his DISCUSS on this matter, I >>>>> propose to cancel >>>>> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/311 and to >>>>> revert the URL changes that were introduced by 6962bis-32. >>>> This sounds good to me. >>> >>> In the absence of any additional comments, and given existing >>> working group consensus on the version being reverted to, let's >>> go ahead and make this so. >> >> I've prepared a PR for this: >> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/310 > > Sorry, wrong URL. This is the new PR: > > https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/312 > >> Do we also need to add some text to 6962-bis to justify why we're not >> adhering to BCP190? Or is this not necessary?
No comments received after a week, so I'm going to merge PR 312 now and publish -33. -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
