On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:20:46 +0000 Rob Stradling <[email protected]> wrote:
> [Chairs: Given the stage we're at with this document, please could I > ask you to confirm whether or not we may adopt James's editorial > suggestions?] > > On 20/09/2019 03:17, Manger, James wrote: > > Editorial suggestions for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis. > > James: Thanks! I think your editorial suggestions add clarity. > > Here's a PR: > https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313 This is a good change. With RFC6962, some implementations include "https://"; when addressing logs and others don't. This change makes clear that "https://"; should be included. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
