Thanks.  Merged.

On 02/10/2019 21:33, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Go ahead Rob,
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Oct 2, 2019, at 14:49, Rob Stradling <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Paul, Melinda,
>>
>> May I go ahead and merge 
>> https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313?
>>
>> James (via a private message) and Andrew have both given it the thumbs 
>> up, but it's still not clear to me what the 6962-bis authors can or 
>> can't do at this point in the editing cycle.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Andrew Ayer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> *Sent:* 24 September 2019 19:15
>> *To:* Rob Stradling <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> *Cc:* Manger, James <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-33: base URL vs 
>> <log server>
>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:20:46 +0000
>> Rob Stradling <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> > [Chairs: Given the stage we're at with this document, please could I
>> > ask you to confirm whether or not we may adopt James's editorial
>> > suggestions?]
>> > 
>> > On 20/09/2019 03:17, Manger, James wrote:
>> > > Editorial suggestions for draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis.
>> > 
>> > James: Thanks!  I think your editorial suggestions add clarity.
>> > 
>> > Here's a PR:
>> > https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/313
>>
>> This is a good change.  With RFC6962, some implementations include
>> "https://"; when addressing logs and others don't.  This change
>> makes clear that "https://"; should be included.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrew
>> _______________________________________________
>> Trans mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
Email: [email protected]
Bradford, UK
Office: +441274024707
Sectigo Limited

This message and any files associated with it may contain legally 
privileged, confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, 
in whole or in part without the express consent of the sender. Please 
notify the sender by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and 
delete it immediately.
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to