> request without modification at a later date. Note that as per
[RFC7231], in the case of a 503 response the log MAY include a
"Retry-After:" header in order to request a minimum time for the
client to wait before retrying the request.
Sorry cache-miss :)
> Mirja is recommending that we also specify in -bis a default (and
completely arbitrary) waiting time, for situations where the log server
does not send an explicit "Retry-After" header. Do you have a view on that?
I am opposed to this change.
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans