>        request without modification at a later date.  Note that as per
        [RFC7231], in the case of a 503 response the log MAY include a
        "Retry-After:" header in order to request a minimum time for the
        client to wait before retrying the request.
  
Sorry cache-miss :)
  
>    Mirja is recommending that we also specify in -bis a default (and 
    completely arbitrary) waiting time, for situations where the log server 
    does not send an explicit "Retry-After" header.  Do you have a view on that?
  
I am opposed to this change.


_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to