On 23/10/2019 16:15, Salz, Rich wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > >> request without modification at a later date. Note that as per > [RFC7231], in the case of a 503 response the log MAY include a > "Retry-After:" header in order to request a minimum time for the > client to wait before retrying the request. > > Sorry cache-miss :) > >> Mirja is recommending that we also specify in -bis a default (and > completely arbitrary) waiting time, for situations where the log server > does not send an explicit "Retry-After" header. Do you have a view on > that? > > I am opposed to this change.
There doesn't seem to be any support for a "default waiting time", so I've merged PR 316 and published draft -34. -- Rob Stradling Senior Research & Development Scientist Sectigo Limited _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
