>> The duplicate 0x0403 seems a bug. Any implementor care to clarify

  *   The duplicate 0x0403 is deliberate, because Deterministic and 
Non-Deterministic ECDSA have different References (RFC6979 and FIPS186-4).

How does a relying party know which one is actually being used?  (I am sure I 
am missing something obvious.)

> As for why this registry, I assume it’s to be a subset of the TLS registry 
> “just because”  Are there any other reasons?

Yes, this was re-wording Mirja’s question. I understand the reasoning; is it 
worth putting something into the draft?



_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to