Done; https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/324/commits/6beb8d7d7d28ce5459cc03d2fc25dbaca5d22333
On 3/30/21, 6:18 PM, "Paul Wouters" <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, 30 Mar 2021, Rob Stradling wrote: > Subject: Re: [Trans] duplicate 0x0403 in signature scheme registry > > > I understand the reasoning; is it worth putting something into the draft? > > Yes, I think it's worth adding a sentence to explain why we're not using the TLS SignatureScheme registry directly. And probably a note about the 'duplicate' entry too ? Paul _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
