Although TRANS is set to wind down without really looking beyond 6962-bis, the 
original Charter also envisaged exploring "mechanisms and techniques that allow 
cryptographically verifiable logs to be deployed to improve the security of 
protocols other than HTTP over TLS, for example SMTP/TLS or software 
distribution", and this was a consideration when we planned the 
(sub-)registries that 6962-bis requests to be created.  Perhaps there will be 
renewed interest in exploring such things in the future, and if so, it's 
conceivable that folks will want to reuse mechanisms from 6962-bis and reuse 
the (sub-)registries.

So I would prefer to name the new, main registry "Public Notary Transparency" 
(the full name of this WG - see https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/trans), and 
either (i) strip the "CT " prefix from the sub-registry names or (ii) change 
the prefix from "CT " to "Transparency ".

Does that make sense?

________________________________
From: Salz, Rich <[email protected]>
Sent: 14 May 2021 18:33
To: Salz, Rich <[email protected]>; Murray S. Kucherawy 
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] 
<[email protected]>; Paul Wouters <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>; 
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on 
draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-36: (with DISCUSS)


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.




  *   It looks like you're making six related registries in Sections 10.2.1 
through 10.2.6.  Would it make sense to create a main registry called 
"Certificate Transparency Parameters" that contains these six sub-registries?



>> I was not familiar with that distinction until now.  Sure, I’ll do that.  Is 
>> there standard wording one should use?



I tried to follow RFC 8126.



https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/334<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fcertificate-transparency-rfcs%2Fpull%2F334&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ca79b9e57bc674a5bc40f08d916fe6f97%7C0e9c48946caa465d96604b6968b49fb7%7C0%7C0%7C637566104446649926%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=cR69ul1vCZSqNb7vivgsFtDbKWtbSTJbvmWKCHdI5Y8%3D&reserved=0>


_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to