==[ Erik's comments
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ballot/*erik-kline
[Roman] The first two seem like trivial editorial fixes.
Sorry I lost the original mail so responding here and explicitly CC'ing Erik.
> [S1.3] [nit]
> * Consider expanding SCT and STH on first use.
We fixed this in draft 40, thanks. It was more of a nit-picking nuisance than
expected :)
> [S4.2.1] [nit]
> * The first sentence reads like a bit of a run-on sentence to me. Perhaps:
Fixed, thanks!
> [S10.1.2] [comment]
> * Not to start a bikeshed, but "trans" strikes me a bit generic for direct
registration under ietf:params (I'd think it meant "transport" before I
thought of "transparency", for example :-).
Yeah, we're not going to re-open that :)
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
