Hi! draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis is now with the RFC Editor (having cleared the WG, IETF Last Call and IESG Review). However, an issue related to distinguishing between v1 and v2 SCTs was recently identified, see [1]. I temporarily stopped advancement of this document in the RFC Editor queue while the issue is explored. After some discussion, Rob has proposed an edit to address this issue, see [2].
Please review [2] and raise any objections by Tuesday, August 31. If none are raised, this new text will be merged into a new document revision (-42); IANA will re-review the document (since this text changes the IANA Considerations section); and the document will continue being processed by the RFC Editor. Thanks, Roman [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/O3oUjxOYr0iBVvjoBfrL5V15r08/ [2] https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/346/files/e87e549410f3b0d5bd173491d3fdcbbc1a980cbd _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
