Hi! No objections were voiced to the proposed change in [2] so it will be merged into the document, and the process will be restarted in the RFC Editor.
Thanks, Roman > -----Original Message----- > From: Trans <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 5:01 PM > To: Trans <[email protected]> > Subject: [Trans] WG consultation on late stage issue in > draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962- > bis > > Hi! > > draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis is now with the RFC Editor (having cleared the > WG, > IETF Last Call and IESG Review). However, an issue related to distinguishing > between v1 and v2 SCTs was recently identified, see [1]. I temporarily > stopped > advancement of this document in the RFC Editor queue while the issue is > explored. After some discussion, Rob has proposed an edit to address this > issue, see [2]. > > Please review [2] and raise any objections by Tuesday, August 31. If none are > raised, this new text will be merged into a new document revision (-42); IANA > will re-review the document (since this text changes the IANA Considerations > section); and the document will continue being processed by the RFC Editor. > > Thanks, > Roman > > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/O3oUjxOYr0iBVvjoBfrL5V15r08/ > [2] https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency- > rfcs/pull/346/files/e87e549410f3b0d5bd173491d3fdcbbc1a980cbd > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
