Scenario B is not HIPAA compliant since the HL for the Billing Provider require subordinate hierarchical levels based upon HL04 = 1 additional subordinate levels.
Gary Beatty 608 Tower Court SE Stewartville, MN 55976 Office Number: 507-250-3574 Fax Number: 209-797-8423 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 837 Transaction Set Hierarchy What guarantees that the transaction sets will be hierarchically compliant? For example: Scenario A Billing Provider/Subscriber/Patient/Billing Provider/Subscriber/Patient ... versus Scenario B Billing Provider/Billing Provider/Subscriber/Subscriber/Patient/Patient ... Either case the HL sequence could link the child back to the appropriate parent. Are both scenarios compliant? Thanks for your help! Ken Hoover Acclamation Systems, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
