Folks,
In the 276, the REF
segment entitled "Service Line Item Identification" (page 91 in the original
"Final" IG) contains the Line Item Control Number. Note #2 for that segment
states, "Required when available from the original
claim. When the Information Receiver is the Provider, this is required when the
number was assigned by the provider on the original
claim."
So let's step
through a scenario. Suppose I receive a 276 containing a Service Line inquiry
with no Line Item Control Number. I search my claims and locate the Service Line
in question. Lo and behold, I have a Line Item Control Number for the
Service Line stored in my database! Which means that it had to come in on
an 837, and had a Line Item Control Number assigned by the
provider.
If the Receiver Name
information and the Service Provider Name information are the same, then
am I bound
by law to stop at that point and reject the Inquiry as non-compliant? That
simplifies things for me, but it only causes delays for the party requesting the
claim status, and all over a minor technicality. (Sort of sums up a lot of these
compliance issues, doesn't it?)
I think I understand
the reason for requiring the Line Item Control Number to be sent if one exists;
it makes it much easier to match to the claim in the Payer's database. But once
I've managed to locate the claim without it, it seems silly to refuse to send
back the information just because I now find that they didn't send me some
additional information that would have made my search
easier.
I'd be interested in
anyone's thoughts on the matter.
BTW, I registered
with the 276/277 listserv (X12N, TG2, WG5), but have not yet been "accepted." It
seems that one must justify their need to participate in an X12
listserv.
Hal Scoggins
SBPA Systems, Inc. (281) 679-7272 x116 ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ===================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. |
- RE: Next 276/277 question Hal Scoggins
- RE: Next 276/277 question Tom Drinkard
- RE: Next 276/277 question Hal Scoggins
- RE: Next 276/277 question Tom Drinkard
- RE: Next 276/277 question LISA GLASSMAN
- RE: Next 276/277 question LISA GLASSMAN
- RE: Next 276/277 question LISA GLASSMAN
- RE: Next 276/277 question LISA GLASSMAN
- RE: Next 276/277 question Alex Chernyak
- RE: Next 276/277 question Alex Chernyak
- RE: Next 276/277 question Hal Scoggins
