There are a few things to bear in mind about DDE, internet or not, vs 270/271 (or any 
mandated transaction for that matter).  If the health plan offers DDE, they must also 
support their 270/271 to the same level as the DDE system, so long as there is a place 
for the information in the 270/271.  Not supporting the standard transaction to the 
same level as on DDE would be considered an incentive to use DDE over the standard 
transaction. 45 CFR Parts 160 and 162 (the transaction final rule) states:
 
"162.925(a)(4) A health plan may not offer an incentive for a health care provider to 
conduct a transaction covered by this part as a transaction described under the 
exception provided for in 162.923(b).
 
"162.923(b) Exception for direct data entry transactions. A health care provider 
electing to use direct data entry offered by a health plan to conduct a transaction 
for which a standard has been adopted under this part must use the applicable data 
content and data condition requirements of the standard when conducting the 
transaction. The health care provider is not required to use the format requirements 
of the standard."

For instance, if the DDE system can identify that the subscriber has a $10 copay for a 
physician office visit, they must return this information in the 271 
(EB*B**98****10~).  If the DDE system identifies the subscriber's Primary Care 
Physician, so must the 271 (EB*L~LS*2120~NM1*P3*1*JONES*MARCUS***MD*SV*111223333~).  
Most of the information that could be displayed on a DDE system would be able to be 
returned in the 271 transaction.
 
The 271 response must also be returned as quickly as the one returned on the DDE 
system (once again there cannot be an incentive to receive a faster response on DDE 
over the standard transaction).
 
Offering an elaborate DDE system and supporting the "Yes/No" minimal response on the 
271 mentioned below would not be a compliant solution.
 
Stuart Beaton
Vice President
Washington Publishing Company
Co-Chair X12N/TG2/WG1 - Health Care Eligibility
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: David Frenkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
        Sent: Thu 5/30/2002 12:53 PM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: Internet Transaction limitations?
        
        

        Larry,
        You are correct but you might ask the healthplans you may work with if
        they can support anything beyond 'yes' or 'no' for eligibility on the
        270/271.  A yes or no response is the minimum requirement for the
        270/271.
        
        Regards,
        
        David Frenkel
        Business Development
        GEFEG USA
        Global Leader in Ecommerce Tools
        www.gefeg.com
        425-260-5030
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:22 AM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: Re: Internet Transaction limitations?
        
        Is it also true, that even if a healthplan supports a DDE type of
        eligibility
        system that they must ALSO support a 270/271 if that transaction is
        requested
        by any of their providers?
        
        Larry A. Saltzman, MD
        
        



Reply via email to