From the proposed modifications to the Transaction Standards published on May 31, 2002 in the Federal Register:
 
Therefore, we propose to modify the standard for the health care payment and remittance advice transaction for retail pharmacy transactions by adopting the ASC X12N 835 in place of the NCPDP standard. With the implementation of this proposal, the ASC X12N 835 would be the only standard for health care payment and remittance advice transactions. All covered entities, including retail pharmacies (Sec. 162.1602), would be required to use ASC X12N 835 when conducting a health care payment and remittance advice transaction.
 
Does anyone have any insight on what type of transactions these would pertain to? Some examples? Most pharmacies deal strictly with real-time online adjudication. From what I could tell from various docs on this, this standard deals with moving of funds to a provider's account - as the paying of Medicare Part A Institutional Claims.
 
From reviewing the specs and the WG5 Payment Reconciliation FAQ, this would not affect online claims adjudication. However some practical examples would be helpful.
 
Thanks!
 
 

Kathleen A. Neugebauer, R.Ph.
Product Manager, High Volume Group
TechRx(tm) Inc.
The Backbone of Pharmacy Commerce
Voice:  301-590-7740
Fax:    301-590-7764
Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 


**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited.

Reply via email to