Deborah, my own sense is that the monetary amount should be returned
whenever it is applicable to the EB01 segment (deductibles, copay,
out-of-pockets, etc).  If you return a zero in the field, the receiver and
their system may interpret as zero copay required.  Any other thoughts from
the group?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:34 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Handling copay and TPL issues on 271


I am researching a couple of issues on the 271 vs. how we currently do
business today and I am finding limitations. For example, our on-line system
currently reports to a provider that a subscriber is active, that copay is
required, is not required, or is met, and lists all TPL carrier information
if applicable. 

>From what I see in the 271, if copay information is indicated in the EB
segment, then monetary values need to be reported in EB07. Since this is a
situational element, my question then becomes, if we want to indicate copay
in EB01, can we leave EB07 blank to indicate co-pay is required, enter 0.00
in EB07 to indicate copay not required, and put 100% in EB08 if copay max
has been met and then indicate in our companion document, user guide (or
whatever you want to call it) how these fields are being used? My fear is
this use of these fields are against what the spirit of HIPAA is all about.
Has anyone else had these issues?


On the TPL information, we currently can return 4 TPL carriers and their
information to the provider. I was looking at loop 2120C to report the TPL
name, address, and contact information, however, this loop only repeats
once. Has anyone found a way of reporting more?


Thanks for you input.
Deborah Sparma


**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board
of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.





======================= Confidentiality Statement ======================= 
The information contained in this message and any attachments is 
intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL 
and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you have received 
this message in error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing, or 
using the information.  Please contact the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete the original message from your system. 
===================== End Confidentiality Statement =====================  




**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.

Reply via email to