transactions  

Messages by Date

• 2002/09/30 RE: state mandates versus HIPAA-required fields on the 834 Rachel Foerster
• 2002/09/30 Re: state mandates versus HIPAA-required fields on the 834 Paul Weber
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB Patricia Gagliardi
• 2002/09/30 state mandates versus HIPAA-required fields on the 834 (In KCoffice) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 state mandates versus HIPAA-required fields on the 834 Tolin, Gary T.
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB Stuart Beaton
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) slarsen
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) slarsen
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB Tom Drinkard
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 FW: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 state mandates versus HIPAA-required fields on the 834(InKCoffice) (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 FW: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Jones, Jennifer
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 state mandates versus HIPAA-required fields on the 834 (InKCoffice) (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 Re: Covered Entity Tool Eliizabeth Thomas
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool David Frenkel
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 Covered Entity Tool David Frenkel
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: Covered Entity Tool David Kibbe
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB (In KC office) Joan Perry
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB Darlene Peterson
• 2002/09/30 RE: 271 loop 2110C EB Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/27 RE: 278 response, Is it an echo of the request? B. Oran Switzer
• 2002/09/27 Re: FW: 835 TRANSACTION QUESTION Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/09/26 Re: 837P Loop 2300 Segment DTP (Date - Referral Date) Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/09/26 Re: 837P Loop 2300 Segment DTP (Date - Referral Date) ScottWahlstrand
• 2002/09/26 271 loop 2110C EB Joan Perry
• 2002/09/26 TCS: 835 Design Mosesso, Laura
• 2002/09/26 RE: 835 TRANSACTION QUESTION Smith, Jeff W.
• 2002/09/26 FW: 835 TRANSACTION QUESTION Bard, Greg
• 2002/09/26 835 TRNSACTION QUESTION Bard, Greg
• 2002/09/26 Re: 837P Loop 2300 Segment DTP (Date - Referral Date) Steven . B . Clark
• 2002/09/26 Re: HCFA 1500 / UB92 to 837 mapping Catherine . Schulten
• 2002/09/26 RE: HCFA 1500 / UB92 to 837 mapping Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/26 278 response, Is it an echo of the request? Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/26 HCFA 1500 / UB92 to 837 mapping Dwayne Riekena
• 2002/09/26 RE: 837P Loop 2300 Segment DTP (Date - Referral Date) Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/26 837P Loop 2300 Segment DTP (Date - Referral Date) ScottWahlstrand
• 2002/09/25 Re: Batch vs real time Anthony Mercaldi
• 2002/09/25 Re: Batch vs real time Anthony Mercaldi
• 2002/09/25 RE: Batch vs real time Lachenmayer, Michael
• 2002/09/25 Re: 835 codes Ken Steen
• 2002/09/25 Re: Prior Authorizations of Non-formulary Drugs Ken Steen
• 2002/09/24 RE: Inpatient/Outpatient claims Thenn
• 2002/09/24 Re: 276 Claim Status Request Alex Chernyak
• 2002/09/24 RE: Inpatient/Outpatient claims Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/24 RE: Batch vs real time Pulver, Scott
• 2002/09/24 Reporting LOB errors and which guide??? Young, Brian
• 2002/09/24 RE: DDE and the 276/277 Rachel Foerster
• 2002/09/24 276 Claim Status Request Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/24 Inpatient/Outpatient claims Thenn
• 2002/09/24 DDE and the 276/277 Romano, Frank
• 2002/09/24 Re: rejecting 270 transactions with dependent loops Bruce Howard
• 2002/09/23 RE: Country Code and Zip code Barton, Joe
• 2002/09/23 rejecting 270 transactions with dependent loops Nick Van Kleeck
• 2002/09/23 RE: Country Code and Zip code Paul Weber
• 2002/09/23 Re: 835 codes Doug Webb
• 2002/09/23 Prior Authorizations of Non-formulary Drugs Tatge, Ellen
• 2002/09/23 RE: WANTED! Mapping Guru! Rachel Foerster
• 2002/09/23 RE: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Rachel Foerster
• 2002/09/23 RE: 835 codes Fleming, Cindy R
• 2002/09/23 RE: Permitted Responses to 276 Inquiries Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/23 RE: Permitted Responses to 276 Inquiries Cindy Monarch
• 2002/09/23 Re: Country Code and Zip code Paul Weber
• 2002/09/23 Re: Permitted Responses to 276 Inquiries Alex Chernyak
• 2002/09/23 RE: Country Code and Zip code Land, Gerald
• 2002/09/23 RE: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Stuart Beaton
• 2002/09/23 RE: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Falbowski, Ellen
• 2002/09/23 Permitted Responses to 276 Inquiries CHanks4548
• 2002/09/23 RE: Country Code and Zip code David Frenkel
• 2002/09/23 Re: Country Code and Zip code DKHGRMI
• 2002/09/23 Re: Country Code and Zip code Marsha E Solomon
• 2002/09/23 Recall: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Robbi McClane
• 2002/09/23 Re: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Jonathan Allen
• 2002/09/23 RE: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Lachenmayer, Michael
• 2002/09/23 RE: Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Mary J Burkinshaw
• 2002/09/23 Re: 835 codes Jan Root
• 2002/09/23 Re: Provider Specialty Code set Patricia Peyton
• 2002/09/23 Missing DTP03 value in transactions... Robbi McClane
• 2002/09/23 Country Code and Zip code Land, Gerald
• 2002/09/23 RE: 835 codes Laura . Kovac
• 2002/09/22 Re: Length of Forthcoming Plan ID PeterBarryList
• 2002/09/21 Re: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Larry Cobler
• 2002/09/21 RE: 276/277 Claim Status Inquiry/Response Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/21 RE: 835 codes Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/21 RE: Batch vs real time Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/21 RE: HIPAA/TCS 101 presentation Boyle, Joan
• 2002/09/21 RE: Confusion about which format to use.... timmcguinness
• 2002/09/20 RE: Confusion about which format to use.... Tom Drinkard
• 2002/09/20 835 codes Fleming, Cindy R
• 2002/09/20 Batch vs real time Fleming, Cindy R
• 2002/09/20 RE: HIPAA/TCS 101 presentation Quinkert, Lin
• 2002/09/20 Re: RECALL MESSAGE POSTED - RE: 837, 835, 276, 277, 834, 820,270, 271 Transactions Terry . Christensen
• 2002/09/20 RE: Please remove me from this list serve Matt Wood
• 2002/09/20 Confusion about which format to use.... mshores
• 2002/09/20 HIPAA/TCS 101 presentation David Frenkel
• 2002/09/20 RE: 276/277 Claim Status Inquiry/Response Cindy Gerber
• 2002/09/20 RECALL MESSAGE POSTED - RE: 837, 835, 276, 277, 834, 820, 270, 271 Transactions Vikas Budhiraja
• 2002/09/20 Re: Admission Codes for 278 Keith Reichert
• 2002/09/20 RE: 837, 835, 276, 277, 834, 820, 270, 271 Transactions Vikas Budhiraja
• 2002/09/20 Provider Specialty Code set Art Schenkman
• 2002/09/20 RE: Capitation payments and the 835 and 271 Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/20 Re: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Doug Webb
• 2002/09/20 276/277 Claim Status Inquiry/Response Jean Gidcumb
• 2002/09/20 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Paulette Drafts
• 2002/09/20 Re: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Paulette Drafts
• 2002/09/20 Re: 835 LX Segment Question Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/09/20 Please remove me from this list serve Bill Yoder
• 2002/09/19 Re: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Kepa Zubeldia
• 2002/09/19 Re: Capitation payments and the 835 and 271 David A. Feinberg, C.D.P.
• 2002/09/19 Re: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured ScottWahlstrand
• 2002/09/19 RE: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Mary J Burkinshaw
• 2002/09/19 Re: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Cathy Sheppard
• 2002/09/19 RE: Handling copay and TPL issues on 271 Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/19 RE: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured DAnderson
• 2002/09/19 RE: Admission Codes for 278 Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/19 RE: 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Betsy Clore
• 2002/09/19 RE: Admission Codes for 278 Matt Wood
• 2002/09/19 RE: Admission Codes for 278 Jean Gidcumb
• 2002/09/19 Medicare 270/271 use compared to 278? mshores
• 2002/09/19 Medicare 270/271 use compared to 278? mshores
• 2002/09/19 Re: Admission Codes for 278 Sandy . Ebel
• 2002/09/19 837p Patient Relationship To Insured Paulette Drafts
• 2002/09/19 Re: Admission Codes for 278 Keith Reichert
• 2002/09/19 RE: Admission Codes for 278 Johnson, Patti A.
• 2002/09/19 Length of Forthcoming Plan ID Goetz, John
• 2002/09/19 RE: Admission Codes for 278 Johnson, Patti A.
• 2002/09/19 Capitation payments and the 835 and 271 Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/19 Re: Identifying the claim uniquely Jan Root
• 2002/09/19 DRG use in 837 and 835 Manning, David
• 2002/09/19 Re: 835 LX Segment Question Patricia . Wijtyk
• 2002/09/19 835 LX Segment Question jfreehill
• 2002/09/19 Admission Codes for 278 Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/19 Re: WANTED! Mapping Guru! Bill
• 2002/09/19 276/277 Claim Status Jonathan Fox
• 2002/09/19 Re: 278 Question David A. Feinberg, C.D.P.
• 2002/09/18 RE: Does an insured group plan have to file extension? Rachel Foerster
• 2002/09/18 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Robert C. Pozniak
• 2002/09/18 WANTED! Mapping Guru! Baseball Player
• 2002/09/18 Summary of Changes 835 V3051 and V4010 Lisa Roth
• 2002/09/18 Re: 837, 835, 276, 277, 834, 820, 270, 271 Transactions KristinBecker1
• 2002/09/18 837, 835, 276, 277, 834, 820, 270, 271 Transactions Baseball Player
• 2002/09/18 Re: 270/271 Keith Reichert
• 2002/09/18 RE: 270/271 Alex Chernyak
• 2002/09/18 RE: Does an insured group plan have to file extension? Askew, Lindsay W
• 2002/09/18 Re: 837I POS Code Doug Webb
• 2002/09/18 Map/Wrap solution impact on reporting systems freida . hall
• 2002/09/18 RE: 270/271 Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/18 RE: Identifying the claim uniquely Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/18 RE: Identifying the claim uniquely Hirth, Alan
• 2002/09/18 270/271 Romano, Frank
• 2002/09/17 RE: TPA question Rachel Foerster
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Jones, Jennifer
• 2002/09/17 Identifying the claim uniquely Kala Anantharam
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Owens, Kris
• 2002/09/17 RE: Handling copay and TPL issues on 271 Herb Larsen
• 2002/09/17 278 Question Turpin, Ron
• 2002/09/17 Does an insured group plan have to file extension? PeterBarryList
• 2002/09/17 837I POS Code Matt Wood
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Sanchez, Penny L
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Owens, Kris
• 2002/09/17 Re: 270/271 Date Issues Jonathan Fox
• 2002/09/17 RE: Handling copay and TPL issues on 271 Hirth, Alan
• 2002/09/17 RE: Handling copay and TPL issues on 271 Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/17 RE: Paper Attachments to Claims Young, Brian
• 2002/09/17 RE: Paper Attachments to Claims Young, Brian
• 2002/09/17 Re: Paper Attachments to Claims Kathleen Simmons
• 2002/09/17 Re: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Kathleen Simmons
• 2002/09/17 RE: PER Segment: Email or Phone Hirth, Alan
• 2002/09/17 Re: Paper Attachments to Claims Cynthia Korman
• 2002/09/17 Paper Attachments to Claims Cynthia Korman
• 2002/09/17 RE: Paper Attachments to Claims Young, Brian
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Robert C. Pozniak
• 2002/09/17 Adjustments Johnson, Patti A.
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Owens, Kris
• 2002/09/17 837D IG understanding Bill
• 2002/09/17 RE: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/17 Handling copay and TPL issues on 271 Sparma, Deborah, nashccon
• 2002/09/17 Re: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Robert C. Pozniak
• 2002/09/17 RE: 837D IG understanding Tom Drinkard
• 2002/09/17 Re: Error reporting Mimi Hart
• 2002/09/17 Re: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Mimi Hart
• 2002/09/17 200 Series Transaction Question Pulver, Scott
• 2002/09/17 PER Segment: Email or Phone Martin Scholl
• 2002/09/17 Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Dyke, David # IHTUL
• 2002/09/17 Re: Secondary Paper Claims and EOB Kathleen Simmons
• 2002/09/17 TPA question Kelley_McCarthy
• 2002/09/17 RE: Follow-up on 835 question earlier Kathleen Simmons
• 2002/09/17 RE: Error reporting Martin Scholl
• 2002/07/19 RE: 004010X061 Interpretation Please... Bill Chessman
• 2002/07/19 Re: 834 Handicapped/Disability Data Paul Weber

• Earlier messages
• Later messages