Title: 835 Balancing and cross footing


I am currently working with a vendor on balancing the 835 as defined in the IG page 19-21.

It appears we have a difference in opinion as to what is balancing.  They state that

lines balance and the claim balances, but they do not have to balance or cross foot to

each other.

Note the example below:

Simple example ...

    3160 *CLP*018918525*1*97*53**15*13221979281508@

    3161  CAS*OA*A1*22.08@

    3162  NM1*QC*1*DROF*TREBOR****MI*525172765@

    3163  NM1*IL*1*DROF*T*G***MI*525172765@

    3164  DTM*232*20020607@

    3165  DTM*233*20020607@

    3166  PER*CX*ISSUING SERVICE CENTER*TE*4015551212@

    3167  SVC*HC<88141<90*44*22.08@

    3168  DTM*472*20020607@

    3169  CAS*CO*45*21.92@

    3170  SVC*HC<88142<90*53*53@

    3171  DTM*472*20020607@


Line Level Balancing

Changes          Payments         Adjustments                        Balance

     44  svc02      22.08 svc03         21.92  CAS03/06/09/12/15/18        00

     53  svc02      53.00 svc03         00.    CAS03/06/09/12/15/18        00

   

Transaction Balancing:

     97  clp03      53.00 clp04         22.08  cas @ claim level

                                        21.92  cas @ line  level           00

Cross Footing:

     97             75.08               44.00                          <22.08>

     ==               <>                  <>                                <>

    

In the above example, the transaction does not cross foot.  The IG on page 20

states:

    When specific service detail is presented, the claim level balancing includes

    balancing the total claim charge (CLP03) to the sum of the related service

    charges (SVC02). Service lines that are not finalized should be adjusted

    with a CAS segment using a Claim Adjustment Group code (CAS01) of 'OA'

    (Other Adjustment), a Claim Adjustment Reason code (CAS02) of 133 (This

    service is suspended pending further review) and the full dollar amount for

    the service in CAS03. When finalized, the claim must be reported using the

    instructions found in the Reversal and Correction section. See 2.2.11, Definition

    of a Claim, for variations related to claim splitting situations.                                      

                                      

It does not address the issue of previous payments and using the 'OA' with a

Claim Adjustment Reason code (CAS02) of 13 to report previous payments and

insuring the transaction cross foots the totals.

I believe the claim should resemble the following:

    3160 *CLP*018918525*1*97*53**15*13221979281508@

    3161  NM1*QC*1*DROF*TREBOR****MI*525172765@

    3162  NM1*IL*1*DROF*T*G***MI*525172765@

    3163  DTM*232*20020607@

    3164  DTM*233*20020607@

    3165  PER*CX*ISSUING SERVICE CENTER*TE*4015551212@

    3166  SVC*HC<88141<90*44*0@

    3167  DTM*472*20020607@

    3168  CAS*OA*B13*22.08@

    3169  CAS*CO*45*21.92@

    3170  SVC*HC<88142<90*53*53@

    3171  DTM*472*20020607@

Line Level Balancing

Changes          Payments         Adjustments                        Balance

     44  svc02      00.00 svc03         44     CAS03/06/09/12/15/18        00

     53  svc02      53.00 svc03         00.                                00

   

Transaction Balancing:

     97  clp03      53.00 clp04         44     cas @ line  level           00

Cross foot:

     97             53.00               44.00                              00

     ==              ==                  ==                                ==

    

Can anyone give me some feed back as to if a claim needs to cross foot?

Bob Ford - ӿ�*

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

401-822-1962



**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

=====================================================

The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.

Reply via email to