On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:32:10PM +0100, Peter Ueger wrote: > 2008/3/25, Francesco Romani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > We (I) had no interest in implement every possible format/codec in the > > wild; > > Why would you have to do that? Others have already done that for you, > don't they? > > > > nor we (I) want to make a framework, just an highly-modular tool > > see above >
transcode is interesting because of it's multi-process/multi-thread design. ffmpeg will never be like that. ffmpeg will never have the filtering capabilities, or third party extendibility that comes from being modular like transcode. it's all about choices. besides, one could argue, that since transcode uses ffmpeg, they really are already a joined force. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
