On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:35 +0100, Francesco Romani wrote: > > One suggestion I do have, if you take the full-repository route, is to > > use Subversion as an intermediate stage--that is, convert the current > > CVS to svn, and then convert that svn repository to hg. I've found > > cvs2svn to work much better than hg convert on a CVS repository. > > Sounds sensible, I'll go this way.
Err, actually, I'd _like_ to go this way: just noticed this line It is not possible to convert a CVS repository to which you only have remote access; into the cvs2svn manpage :) Bests, -- Francesco Romani // Ikitt http://fromani.exit1.org ::: transcode homepage http://tcforge.berlios.de ::: transcode experimental forge
