Phil Ehrens wrote:

> It doesn't cost anything to keep the old cvs repo around
> read-only and just move the current version to svn, hg,
> or whatever. The old official release tarballs can be
> checked in to the new binary-friendly repo without a
> problem.

Having access to the old sources (as tarballs) is one thing. Having 
access to the full history / change logs is another. So a true cvs->hg 
conversion should be the preferred method.

Regards,

Jörn

-- 
 .''`.  Jörn Reder <jo...@zyn.de>
: :' :  http://www.exit1.org/
`. `'
  `-    Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: pgp7ldb3rHDrW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to