On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:58 +0000, Andrew Church wrote: [...] > In this case, I was the only developer, so there was no issue of who made > the change (though I did note where suggestions/bug reports came from); > but even for transcode, does it really matter to the users which of us > committed each particular change? After all, we have the Mercurial log, > and if nothing else, one could look up where a particular ChangeLog entry > was made and see who committed it. For that matter, dates probably aren't > important for the same reason, so we could even trim it down to something > like: > > ======================= > transcode-1.2.0 > --------------- > [+] New module system implemented. > [+] Added some weird option to transcode. > [*] Default number of buffers increased to 17. > [*] Fixed crash with -i /dev/urandom. > [-] Support for DivX 0.x (ancient) removed. > ======================= [...]
I agree completely (And I started thinking roughly the same after the previous message sent) I'd like to propose this key: [+] new feature [*] changement/improvement (not bugfix) [!] bugfix [-] feature dropped (More will be added if needed) -- Francesco Romani // Ikitt http://fromani.exit1.org ::: transcode homepage http://tcforge.berlios.de ::: transcode experimental forge
