>> I wonder if it wouldn't be preferable for the file size >> option to be taken as a scaling factor, i.e. 600Mb per hour >> of material instead of per input file. >> >> > >Jeff Hyche wrote: > I have not thought of that, and I'm not exactly sure how to do it. I'm also > not sure of how much better it would be than what I'm doing. One thing that > I'm thinking for doing is instead of file size, do a bpp setting. If you > don't input a file size the program will generate a bitrate based on the bpp > ration being around 0.2.
fsize=`bc << _EOF $seconds*$mbytes/3600 _EOF `
