On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 20:43 +0200, Ralf Hoffmann wrote:
> I tried the latest CVS version and it solves the problem. As far as I 
> can tell the video created with the CVS version looks the same as with 
> my patch for the 1.0 tree.

That's very nice, I'll evaluate a backport for 1.0.x.
The only drawback is that we want to move ahead to 1.1.x as soon as is
possible, and mantianing 1.0.x branch consumes some precious (because it
is so scarce) development time.

[...]
> Perhaps there's a good reason for not enabling some options and I don't 
> know if this has been discussed already so please take this only as some 
> kind of feature request :-)

The rationale for this choice is to keep as small as is possible the
core dependencies for transcode. I've mixed feelings about that since
AFAIK a bunch of users will still enable by hand a lot of options.
Maybe that will change during our beta cycle, that is hopefully not so
distant in our future.

Best regards,

-- 
Francesco Romani

Reply via email to