Hi Bob, The specific post I'm referring to is here: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/msg/203ace509ed70f69
There is also another post by Mark that says you should _generally_ have only one TO per table: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/msg/f68a829a19fb4726 I've seen your blog post on STI and a couple of posts on the list where other people where successfully using it and I can't see any issues with it either. Thanks, Chris On Mar 1, 10:25 am, Bob Silverberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Just back from a week in Jamaica, hence the late reply ;-) > > I did an experiment in which I was able to implement a form of single > table inheritance using Transfer, which I wrote about on my blog. I > did not foresee any problems with the cache, so I'm not sure to what > you are referring. Do you have any links to the posts that you read > that suggest this can be a problem? > > Cheers, > Bob > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, achebe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've seen a few posts on Single Table Inheritance where it's been > > mentioned that it can be done but that it is difficult because of the > > need to manage the transfer cache and I was hoping someone could shed > > a little light on what specific issues there are to look out for? > > -- > Bob Silverbergwww.silverwareconsulting.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
