In this case the apostrophe implies a contraction. It's == it is Brian was using "its" to imply possessiveness (go behind it's back == go behind the back of Transfer) which (from what I remember) doesn't use the apostrophe.
Best Wishes, Peter On Mar 6, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Alan Livie wrote: > @brian, you're correct but I still don't understand. > > If I shorten HAS NOT to HASN'T why is shortening IT IS to IT'S wrong? > > English is so confusing sometimes! > > Alan > > > From: Brian Kotek <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2009 4:15:13 PM > Subject: [transfer-dev] Re: Have a One to Many relationship while > still being able to query by the child foreign key > > ITS, not IT'S. I hate when I do that! > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Brian Kotek <[email protected]> > wrote: > I don't believe so. You'll need to remove it and either use TQL to > do your list query, or write your own list query yourself outside of > Transfer. Part of the point of Transfer is that you're dealing with > Objects and their relationships, not tables and foreign keys. So > trying to "go behind it's back" and do things like using foreign key > columns directly is discouraged. > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
