Ah, in which case, I'll shut my gob ;o) I wonder why it's inconsistent that way.
Mark On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Brian Kotek <[email protected]> wrote: > That's the thing, I'm farily sure that the way it works for Flash Remoting > is *not* how it works for web service calls, they're handled by totally > separate adapters. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mark Mandel <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Actually Brian, I expect that if you define your <cfproperty> tags >> correctly, CF will look for get() methods like it does with Flex, when it >> can't find the variables under 'this' (least I assume this is how it would >> work, it's how it works in Flex). >> >> I'm wondering if the issue is that on server 2, what you are trying to >> deserialise to? i.e. what do you expect to get back, the original >> TransferObject? a CFC with properties? or just a struct? >> >> I doubt the webservice would be able to rebuild a TO from scratch for you >> on the recieving end, but I would have thought it could build a CFC with >> properties, or just a struct pretty easily. >> >> What is the errors you are getting? >> >> Mark >> >> > > > > -- E: [email protected] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
