@Brian/Mark, Thanks for replying guys. You've confirmed my suspicion and I think I've won a bet with a coworker. I have been telling him that we should use our facade CFCs to rely on Transfer, but to return data in the form of structs, arrays, and recordsets. He was hoping that we could use the facade CFCs to return the actual Transfer Objects without having to manipulate the data within the facade CFC. I couldn't quite figure out how to convince him of this fact. In other words, I knew it was not possible, but I didn't know why.
Thanks again! Damon On Mar 24, 1:08 pm, Brian Kotek <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh I'm not positive that it's the case (I really don't use CF's web services > very much), but I'm *fairly* sure it is. The original poster will definitely > want to confirm. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah, in which case, I'll shut my gob ;o) > > > I wonder why it's inconsistent that way. > > > Mark > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Brian Kotek <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> That's the thing, I'm farily sure that the way it works for Flash Remoting > >> is *not* how it works for web service calls, they're handled by totally > >> separate adapters. > > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mark Mandel <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> Actually Brian, I expect that if you define your <cfproperty> tags > >>> correctly, CF will look for get() methods like it does with Flex, when it > >>> can't find the variables under 'this' (least I assume this is how it would > >>> work, it's how it works in Flex). > > >>> I'm wondering if the issue is that on server 2, what you are trying to > >>> deserialise to? i.e. what do you expect to get back, the original > >>> TransferObject? a CFC with properties? or just a struct? > > >>> I doubt the webservice would be able to rebuild a TO from scratch for you > >>> on the recieving end, but I would have thought it could build a CFC with > >>> properties, or just a struct pretty easily. > > >>> What is the errors you are getting? > > >>> Mark > > > -- > > E: [email protected] > > W:www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
