You cannot have the m2m as well as an o2m with the same table.
Additionally, the m2m's other properties will not be recognized in the m2m
relationship.

Based upon my quick glance at the code, i would suggest utilizing an m2o for
each, and then using decorator methods to gain the additional functionality
you would need.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to