Thanks for the reply. Don't you mean onetomany? applications onetomany with applications_users and then users onetomany with applications_users?
Thanks again On Oct 1, 3:09 pm, Matt Quackenbush <[email protected]> wrote: > You cannot have the m2m as well as an o2m with the same table. > Additionally, the m2m's other properties will not be recognized in the m2m > relationship. > > Based upon my quick glance at the code, i would suggest utilizing an m2o for > each, and then using decorator methods to gain the additional functionality > you would need. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
