unsubscribe -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:04 PM To: transfer-dev Subject: [transfer-dev] Re: Some updates to Pluggable Cache Branch
Hi All, Is anyone using the pluggable cache in production yet? If so, has it improved the scalability of your application? (eg, reducing memory pressure) Dave On Jan 13, 3:37 pm, Mark Mandel <[email protected]> wrote: > To give you all a heads up - > > A couple of fixes in the pluggable cache branch: > > - Better concurrency and locking per object > Seems there was a bug where under high load, cached objects could > be > discard between lazy load checks, which would cause issues. This > should > solve that problem. > - I renamed some methods to get around 'super' resolutions under > ColdFusion 9. So that should solve some issues with methods > randomly > disappearing. > > Let me know if you run into any issues. > > Mark > -- > E: [email protected] > T:http://www.twitter.com/neurotic > W:www.compoundtheory.com
-- Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
