On Feb 4, 12:35 pm, Jamie Krug <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't say for sure that CF9 would have the same performance gain > that I saw with Railo, when moving from CF8, but I'd expect similar > improvement. The servlet container can have a big affect on resources > as well. Tomcat is certainly more lightweight than JRun, and though > it's not officially supported by CF9, it works fine with one jar added > for ORM support (I think there's a good post about this on Alagad's > blog).
Thanks Jamie - great info (and great post btw). I'm definitely exploring alternatives on the servlet container as well - curious about Glassfish as I saw it run last year with Jared at cf.objective() and he raved about the speed. Oddly it was supported by Adobe for awhile and then de-supported I think? Don't know what happened there. Our app is just pokey at times (CF8 on newer JVM on CentOS 5), especially when doing lots of object work. We know the speeds from the database performance is OK as we monitor that directly so we're looking for ways to speed up CF itself. Part of this is in preparation to move our stuff onto EC2 later this year where we will (most likely) be taking a performance hit. So long as we don't wind up net slower, we'll be OK. Not to hijack my own topic, but any consensus in the community about switching from Jrun? Jboss, Tomcat, Glassfish? My head is spinning a bit like when I first went to multi-instance. :) Brian -- Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
