Thanks James.  I will have to keep an eye on that.

On Sep 28, 1:30 pm, "James Allen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The way I see it is that with Transfer - due to the excellent caching layer
> - is that while there may be an initial performance hit while the objects
> are instantiated, once they are performance is great.
>
> I've just built another big application (a rebuild of an old procedural
> codebase) that uses Transfer and performance is superb. Much faster than the
> old site which used queries throughout (although no real caching).
>
> The great thing is that once a site is up and running most of the commonly
> accessed objects will be in the cache at all times and so performance should
> be great. This will obviously depend on overall server usage and site
> structure but so far I've found relying on the Transfer cache is spot on.
>
> ---
> James  Allen
> E: [email protected]
> Blog:http://jamesallen.name
> Twitter: @CFJamesAllen (Coldfusion / Web development)
> Twitter: @jamesallenuk (General)
> Twitter: @JamesAllenVoice (Voiceover)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>
> On Behalf Of David Long
> Sent: 28 September 2010 18:26
> To: transfer-dev
> Subject: [transfer-dev] Re: listByProperty with Relationships
>
> I am glad I learned a little bit more about the transfer object.  I
> have now shortened my gateway CFC for the variations section of my
> application by converting query lists to objects by a pretty big
> amount of lines.
> Could you tell me though what the performance impact is on using the
> object?  It seems as though it causes quite a few function calls at
> times...
>
> On Sep 28, 12:21 pm, Tom McNeer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi David,
>
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:30 AM, David Long <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks Tom.  That is extremely helpful.
>
> > Good. Glad to have helped.
>
> > >  I am still very new to ORM so
> > > I didn't realize that it is better to have an object than a query.
>
> > Well, the "point" of using an ORM is to be able to use objects. Otherwise,
> > it's not much of a help.
>
> > But it's not "always" better to use objects. Sometimes a simple query list
> > is all you need. And the query list avoids some expensive object creation.
>
> > As you work with Transfer - or CF9's built-in Hibernate functions - you'll
> > get more of a feeling of what to use when.
>
> > Good luck.
>
> > --
> > Thanks,
>
> > Tom
>
> > Tom McNeer
> > MediumCoolhttp://www.mediumcool.com
> > 1735 Johnson Road NE
> > Atlanta, GA 30306
> > 404.589.0560
>
> --
> Before posting questions to the group please 
> read:http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-qu...
> -on-transfer
>
> Try out the new Transfer ORM Custom Google 
> Search:http://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=002375903941309441958:2s7wbd5ocb8
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "transfer-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en

-- 
Before posting questions to the group please read:
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer

Try out the new Transfer ORM Custom Google Search:
http://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=002375903941309441958:2s7wbd5ocb8

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"transfer-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en

Reply via email to