Hi, > I'm just wondering about this: if Pootle is available at > server.org/pootle/, will server.org/pootle/robots.txt mean anything or > help any search engines? I thought that bots only read the robots file > in the root of the server. you are right - I was just had the feeling, that its content should be consistent anyway
> Furthermore, baseurl is usually a full URL (including the http:// part). > Is that allowed in a Disallow clause? (heh:-) I was under the > impression that only relative paths are used. your "impression" conforms to the specification :) but: the baseurl (as used by pootle) does not include the protocol (as far as I can see). Thus the result should be appropriate. (even if it is uselesse because of the point you mentioned above) >From my point of view there are two possibilities: - you could ignore the patch and add some comments regarding this baseurl discussion to the code - you could merge the patch and add some comments regarding this baseurl discussion to the code what do you think? Lars PS: yes, now I see - this patch was not thaaaat important :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
