Hi, > * There are no users of the functions hascvs, hassvn, and hasdarcs - > can we drop them? yes - that sounds good
> * After moving to the toolkit, would it be meaningful to split this > into separate files? Perhaps even a dedicated directory under > storage/versioncontrol? yes, this would improve the structure. But I am not really sure, if version control in general should be integrated in this file base way, as it is now. I think, that a item based approach would be more reasonable and should better fit to the (maybe) future database storage backend (http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/pootle/metadata). As long as the current code is only part of pootle, it is quite easy to change its interface. As a part of the translate toolkit, it would be much harder to change it, I guess. But maybe the 'metadata' document is outdated anyway? In short: yes - it should be splitted. > * I will make some cosmetic changes, but I see things like the error > messages were not consistent before the change yes - I wanted to keep the changes small and wait for a first "yes" or "no" ... regards, Lars ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
