Hi,
Am Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:27:18 +0200 schrieb Miklos Vajna
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:39:37AM +0200, Lars Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > sorry for the trouble, but it looks, like you are the first one who tries to
> > use bzr in a real life situation with pootle. So please don't be
> > disappointed, if we need one or two more mails for fixing all problems,
> > that could occour ...
>
> Given that I think I'm the author of the problematic code, I tried to
> reproduce, and I guessed this will be realted to have the po files
> outside the Pootle dir, just like the problem we recently fixed in git.
somehow I have a similar feeling here, too: in this case /var/lib/pootle/foo
is a symlink to a sub-directory of the repository structure (instead of
direct symlinks to po-files). I never tested this with a version control system,
with meta-data (".bzr") only at the top level (in subversion the ".svn"
directories exist in every sub-directory of the repository).
> Though I can't reproduce that so easily bzr cat outside the repo works
> fine here both with absolute and relative paths.
same for me.
> However, I have 1.5 installed (I can't remember what version did I have
> when I wrote the original code), and Cristóbal has 1.3. Maybe this is
> the difference?
I installed bzr 1.3.1 for testing (taken from
http://packages.ubuntu.com/de/hardy/devel/bzr). But I still couldn't reproduce
it.
Lars
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Translate-pootle mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
