"Siebrand Mazeland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Contrary to your belief I think you I are still quite angry at > something that happended or something that someone did or wrote. I > have problem identifying what it is exactly, which makes it hard to > address. I find few of the statements you made below to be true.
Yes, I'm still angry about some of the comments. I will be for eternity. But since that won't change, just forget it. Neither you, nor Niklas is to be blamed for someone else making flippant remarks. > Can you let us know what you would need to be satisfied, or in your > eyes be properly credited for everything you have done for the > Danish translation? Your current choice of debate does not strike me > as solution driven, which is something I personally very much > prefer. The reason I may seem un-constructive, is the simple fact that while I'm able to point out the problems as I see them, I have no idea how to solve them. If we leave my ego out of the equation for the moment, the main issue is that at some of the interface messages will be completely unknown and opaque to the translators. The obvious solution to that is instrumenting the code, so that any message can be seen in its context. That is going to take quite a lot of time, and not something I think will happen right away. More realistic, would be crafting a set of more or less static pages, that displays all of the messages in the contexts they are used. That will ba a game of constant catchup, but at least it will be easier than to change the entire codebase to include a demo feature of sorts. -- // Wegge <http://geowiki.wegge.dk/wiki/Forside> - Alt om geocaching Bruger du den gratis spamfighther ser jeg kun dine indlæg *EN* gang. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Translators-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l
