On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 22:33 -0700, Mark Doliner wrote: > Friedel, I image there is a reason that we're using "%x %X" instead of > "%c" (which is "the preferred date and time representation for the > current locale"), but I don't know what it is.
I really want to know who prefers the output of %c... K&R, perhaps? $ date "+%x %X" 08/11/2008 01:55:29 AM $ date "+%c" Mon 11 Aug 2008 01:55:31 AM CDT I'd really love to see %c do smart relative dates, but that'll never happen. Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Translators mailing list [email protected] http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/translators
