From: Jack Marshall <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected] Organization: Bay Networks
Hi, Charles, I would imagine that the FCC would respond the same way they did when 33.6 came out. It required companies to have signal power testing done and modification filings submitted. At the time, Rockwell said that there was no difference between a 28.8 kbps carrier and a 33.6 kbps carrier except the constellation, so no testing should be required. However, it was also argued that the constellation is part of what defines what is transmitted, therefore testing _is_ necessary. Bill Von Alven, any comments? Jack Marshall Charles Purwin wrote: > > I might be jumping the gun here, but does anyone know > how the FCC is planning on handling the telcom issues related > to testing the new speeds. I know that I need to come up > with a reasonable test setup on my side of things. > (I can just see it now, 'okay lets setup the CO and the > digital link' :) ) > > Since most companies are pushing for a rapid deployment > of the new speed how is the FCC responding? > > Charles > > [email protected] > (soon to have 56k!)
