From: Kevin Richardson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Carrier Equipment requirements

Treggers,

Martin's words below are correct but LARGE "exchange" type equipment will
still be considered "commercial" equipment by the SMA in Australia and so
Class A would apply.  Martin's words below surely would apply to smaller
telecommunications equipment such as routers/servers and multiplexors
normally used in the business environment.

Regards,
Kevin

Martin Garwood wrote:

> Richard,
> 
> At the moment in Australia, carrier equipment is exempt from
> safety/interworking requirements. This may change after July 1997 with
> deregulation, as the new act has a broad definition of who can be a
> carrier. The EMC requirements under the EMC framework do however apply
> (from 1 Jan 1997) for new equipment.
> 
> A seperate issue that many suppliers may not be aware of, the SMA have
> allowed (thru Austel's past practice), residential type CE to only meet
> class A for CISPR22. This allowance is until Jan 1 1998. After that
> date, new & EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY BEING SOLD must comply with class B,
> whether it was 1st sold before Jan 1 1998 or not. BEWARE !
> 
> Best Regards 
> 
> 
> > 
> > FROM RICHARD STEELE
> > Organization: Digi International
> > 
> > Fellow Treggers,
> > 
> > Jon D Curtis wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Kevin Richardson <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Standards applicable to transponders & interrogators
> > >
> > > I do not believe there are any specific international standards
concerning
> > > rail transportation and associated transponders/receivers.  The
> > > requirements would therefore be derived from generic standards for
safety
> > > and EMC concerning similar radio transponders and receivers.
> > >
> > > This type of scenario in Australia I believe would be handled as
follows:
> > > Safety would be covered by generic safety standards and in addition
"Work
> > > Safe" standards.  EMC would be covered also by generic standards and
the
> > > normal requirements under the new EMC Framework in Australia.  In
addition,
> > > for Australia a "Class Licence" for a low power radio transmitter
would
> > > probably be required.
> > 
> > Does anyone know what the Safety requirements for Exchange based
> > telecommunications equipment such as multiplexor switches are in
> > Australia/New Zealand?
> > 
> > What are the "generic safety standards" and "work safe standards"?
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Richard Steele
> 


Best regards,
Kevin


Kevin Richardson                                        Ph:    043-29-4070
Stanimore Pty Limited                                   Fax:   043-28-5639
"The Technology Requirements Specialists"               Int'l:
+61-43-xx-xxxx

Email:  Internet:  [email protected]            Compuserve:
100356,374

Reply via email to