RE>>IEC 950 / UL 1950 creepa                 5/9/97

Me again...........
Once you have determined which pollution degreee your product falls under, you 
can determine your creepage & clearance distances (in Table 6) by the CTI of 
your traces.  (This is, to my understanding, of what "Material group" is)
CTI ratings refers to the value obtained in accordance with method A of IEC 112.
(Note: If you can't determine which material group you fall into, material 
group IIIb SHALL be assumed.)

Regards,
Regan
--------------------------------------
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 5/9/97 12:42 PM
To: Regan Arndt
From: [email protected]
                      RE>IEC 950 / UL 1950 creepage and*           5/9/97

The values for Pollution Degree 1 are applicable to components and assemblies 
which are sealed so as to exclude dust and moisture
(see clause 2.9.6 of CSA C22.2 No. 950-95)
The values for Pollution Degree 2 are generally applicable to equipment covered 
by the scope of the  CSA C22.2 No. 950-95 standard (IEC 950 based)
The values for Pollution Degree 3 are applicable where a local internal 
environment within the equipment is subject to conductive pollution or to  
dry-conductive pollution which could become conductive due to expected 
condensation.

Regards,
Regan Arndt
Safety Technologist
NORTEL
--------------------------------------
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 5/9/97 12:27 AM
To: Regan Arndt
From: [email protected]
     To any and all safety gurus,

        I am in the midst of trying to minimize the creepage and clearance
     requirements between TNV and SELV called out in IEC 950.  My
     interpretation of tables 5 and 6 in sections 2.9.2. and 2.9.3 are that
     minimum clearance is 2.0mm and minimum creepage is 2.5mm.  This is
     based on a global design using up to 250V mains, pollution degree 1 &
     2 and Material Group IIIa + IIIb.  The application is for Class I as 
     well as Class II systems.

        I could not find a reference explaining the definition of the
     Material Groups and would appreciate any insight into a clause, etc. 
     which I could reference to reduce these spacing requirements.  Please
     also advise if you are in need of further details.

     Thx,


     Joe

     **********************************************************************
     Joe Finlayson
     Manager, Compliance Engineering
     Microcom, Inc.

------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by nmisq2.miss.nt.com with SMTP;9 May 1997 00:25:54 -0400
Received: from bcarsde4.localhost (actually bcarsde4.ott.bnr.ca)
          by bcarsfbb.ott.bnr.ca; Thu, 8 May 1997 15:10:47 -0400
Received: from europe.std.com by bcarsde4.localhost;
          Thu, 8 May 1997 15:04:59 -0400
Received: by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0) id PAA13113;
          Thu, 8 May 1997 15:08:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0) id PAA13100;
          Thu, 8 May 1997 15:08:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sw.microcom.com by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA02571;
          Thu, 8 May 1997 15:08:40 -0400
Received: from sw.microcom.com (root@localhost)
          by sw.microcom.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA24783
          for <[email protected]>; Thu, 8 May 1997 15:09:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp.microcom.com ([199.99.215.11])
          by sw.microcom.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA24770
          for <[email protected]>; Thu, 8 May 1997 15:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ccMail
          by smtp.microcom.com (IMA Internet Exchange 2.1 Enterprise)
          id 00016C26; Thu, 8 May 97 15:11:58 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 15:01:07 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected] (Joe Finlayson)
Subject: IEC 950 / UL 1950 creepage and clearance requirements
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [email protected]




------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by nmisq2.miss.nt.com with SMTP;9 May 1997 12:37:00 -0400
Received: from bcarsde4.localhost (actually bcarsde4.ott.bnr.ca)
          by bcarsfbb.ott.bnr.ca; Fri, 9 May 1997 10:10:05 -0400
Received: from europe.std.com by bcarsde4.localhost;
          Fri, 9 May 1997 10:01:27 -0400
Received: by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0) id KAA24496;
          Fri, 9 May 1997 10:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from world.std.com by europe.std.com (8.7.6/BZS-8-1.0) id KAA24488;
          Fri, 9 May 1997 10:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bcarsde4.localhost (mailgate.nortel.ca)
          by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA01362;
          Fri, 9 May 1997 10:04:50 -0400
Received: from bcars735.ott.bnr.ca (actually 47.128.2.191)
          by bcarsde4.localhost; Fri, 9 May 1997 09:51:43 -0400
Received: from nmiss1.miss.nt.com by bcars735.ott.bnr.ca;
          Fri, 9 May 1997 09:55:32 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 9 May 1997 07:52:05 -0400
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IEC 950 / UL 1950 creepa
To: [email protected]
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.3.97.04.01
Sender: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [email protected]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; Name="Message Body"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable


Reply via email to