I have approved various devices in Germany under 223ZV5 and
had no problem getting a 2 wire connection approved.
No relay, no loop through, but you have to declare that
the connector style used is 'F' (=phone) instead of 'N' (=modems, fax etc)

David is right: the wall sockets in Germany are wirde in a way that
the one closest to the entry point into the house has the possibility
to 'kill' another phone down stream. An F connector does not have that
possibility, it's allways the end of the line, only the N style of the TAE-6
allows devices downstream.

Best regards, Rene

----------
From:   [email protected] on behalf of David Drori
Sent:   Monday, June 09, 1997 4:43 PM
To:     INTERNET:[email protected]
Subject:        RE: No Parallel Telephone Equipment for Germany?

Vic,

The German authority, BAPT, has no problem with telephone equipment being=

connected in parallel when they're on-hook; on the contrary, they're
supposed to work in parallel, just like everywhere else, otherwise they
wouldn't all ring when an incoming call arrives!

The German discomfort with parallel connections in the *off-hook* state
arises, as far as I can gather, from questions of privacy, and (at least =
in
the past) from the desire to prevent users from interfering with each oth=
er
when they're engaged in conversations or in data communications. Possibly=
,
they are also worried (unnecessarily, most of us would agree) that parall=
el
off-hook telephones might not receive sufficient DC power to support
satisfactory two-way speech in all cases.

Unless I have misunderstood everything about the German system, it seems =
to
me that support for telephone conferencing (without the drawbacks of a
speakerphone) by allowing two or more local users raise the receivers of
separate telephone sets sharing the same line, which is an amenity that
telephone users in most countries enjoy, is denied to German subscribers.=

It also appears to me that if one local German user is talking on the
telephone and another user situated downstream (in the direction of the
central office) picks up his telephone, the first user will suddenly have=
 a
dead line. This seems to me to be a severe pain in the neck to me rather
than a weel thought-out feature. In most other countries, such an event
would terminate with the second user immediately replacing the receiver
without any harm having being done, or at worst replacing the receiver
after the first user yells at him to do so!

I suppose these differences come into the category of national psyche and=

nobody may claim superiority. Everyone is entitled to his own point of
view. Also, there may be locally applicable technical reasons for
apparently arbitrary decisions, of which outsiders may be quite unaware.
*However*, as a question of law, it seemed to me that a Directive (aren't=

Directives legally binding on EU members?) of the European Union, of whic=
h
Germany is a member, required each member country to condense its nationa=
l
requirements into those truly essential for correct operation of the
network. Differences in psychological standpoint, such as the issue of
non-parallel connections appears to constitute, do appear to violate that=

law. It is a fact that TBR21 is being delayed for such a ridiculously
lengthy period, to the detriment of nearly all those involvedin, and
influenced by, its success or failure, partly due to such philosophical
differences.

Regards,

David Drori

>What was wrong with installing telephones in parallel.  In north America=

we've always =

>installed telephones in parallel and we have the REN (USA) or Load Numbe=
r
(Canada)
> to indicate the load equivalency of a device.  (Network design would
allow for
> operation of a maximum of five C-4 (electromechanical) ringers in
parallel.

>Granted, if you install an electronic device in parallel with an
>electromechanical device,
>the electromechanical devise tends to suck up all the current and the
electronic
>device won't work very well.  That problem is self-correcting, I can
assure you.
>Check garbage during weekly collection day  (people do not neccessarily
throw away the device they
>should).


>Ciao,


>Vic  Boersma

-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--
Novarex Enterprises Ltd.,
POB 2833,
Jerusalem 91028,
Israel.
Tel: +972 2 581 0995
Fax: +972 2 581 3750
Mobile: +972 5 067 8686
E-mail: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
--

[End of message]

Reply via email to