In response to the recent MRA Bulletin (text provided at the end of this
message), 

For those of you who would like a bit more of a clarification on this, I offer
the following:

-  The United States and Canada have reached an Agreement with the European
Union for establishing a regulatory structure to support a mutual acceptance of
product approvals. The Agreement is expected to be initialed this week.   What
does this mean?

. CE Marking requirements will continue to be fully enforced.
 
. MRAs will provide the mechanism for U.S. organizations to be appointed 3rd
party approval authorities for CE Marking in the following sectors:  Electrical
Safety, EMC, Medical Devices and Pharmaceuticals, Telecom, and
Recreational/Leisure Craft.

. It will take a minimum of one year for the agreement to be approved by the
member countries of the European Union for implementation.  Only when the
agreement has been implemented, will a treaty go into force.

This bulletin will be followed with more specific details.  A MRA Update section
will be added to our web site at http://www.TechIntl.com.   Updates will also be
provided via email if an email address is provided to us.

-----And Furthermore-----

After implementation has begun the listed product sectors will have following
transition periods:

Electrical Safety will be "fully operational" right away.

Telecom and EMC will have a 24 month transition period

Medical and Pharmaceutical GMPs will have a 36 month transition period

Recreational and leisure craft will have a 18 month transition period

This Agreement must be approved by the World trade Organization (WTO)

Likely: Impact:
No change in regulatory compliance process for 12 months. The regulatory
structure is still to be developed in the United States. The new system will
likely have a lead Government agency (probably NIST). Existing regulatory
compliance providers will likely have a major impact in the actual process.

Best plan:
Continue with existing CE Marking compliance plans. Establish a regular
communication with EU compliance resources for latest details on emerging
system. Continue to meet domestic compliance requirements.

Comments:  Since it's going to take all 15 member states to accept this, look
forward to a bureaucratic nightmare, and the possibilities of real delays,
especially in the Telecom area where all of our favorite destination countries
are controlled by state-owned monopolies.

Personally, I look forward to it.  I think it will certainly level the playing
field and get all of these bottle-neck agencies to compete a bit more
effectively.  In addition, we should all see our costs of doing business in the
regulatory environment come down.

At the risk of advertising for a company by whom I will no longer be employed in
a week from now, check out the website mentioned above for up-to-the minute
details.  The CEO has an in with the Commerce Department

Best regards. 

Rick Towner,
soon-to-be regulatory compliance manager, Comdisco Corporation, CEG division.
same bat place, 
same bat channel.

P.S.  Nice poem, Dave.
_________________________________________________________
U.S., EU Reach Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Product Testing &
Approval Requirements
Agreements cover $50 billion in two-way trade

U.S. Department of Commerce News Release from the Office of the
Secretary,
Friday, June 13, 1997

Washington-- The United States and European Union have agreed to a
package
of mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) that will reduce trade barriers
in
six industry sectors covering approximately $50 billion two-way trade,
U.S.
Commerce Secretary William M. Daley and U.S. Trade Representative
Charlene
Barshefsky announced.

When fully implemented, the agreements willrecognize the results of
product
testing or certification requirements set by both governments and
eliminates the need for duplicative testing, inspection, or
certification
requirements for products from each side of the Atlantic.

"Under this landmark agreement U.S. regulatory agencies, for the first
time, have entered into a cooperative international agreement that
strives
to reduce regulatory costs while at the same time seeks to expand market
access and protect the health and safety of consumers on both sides of
the
Atlantic," Commerce Secretary Daley said.

"Completion of these mutual recognition agreements has been a
longstanding
priority of the United States and the European Union," Secretary Daley
added. "I also want to give credit to the Transatlantic Business
Dialogue.
The TABD and the MRA was important; we heard them and acted."

"We achieved an agreement that is good for U.S. and EU business, good
for
our regulatory agencies, and good for our consumers," said Barshefsky.
"The
MRA is yet another example of the Administration's push to open markets
in
sectoral areas where the United States leads the world, while assuring
our
absolute right to choose our own health and safety standards. The real
winners today are manufacturers, workers, and consumers, both in America
and in Europe, who will see reduced costs, increased jobs, and a better
standard of living."

These agreements are expected to increase U.S. exports by saving
manufacturers more than $1 billion in costs annually, which is
equivalent
to a two or three point reduction in tariffs. The MRAs include
telecommunications, medical devices, electromagnetic compatibility,
electrical safety, recreational craft, and pharmaceuticals. The
agreements
allow products or processes to be assessed for conformity (i.e.,
testing,
inspection, and certification) in the United States to European Union
standards, and vice versa.

After entry into force, the agreements will be phased in and fully
implemented in two years for electronic products and three years for
health
products.

This agreement was concluded with the support of the Transatlantic
Business
Dialogue (TABD), a U.S.-EU government-business partnership that
generates
business recommendations for removing barriers to transatlantic trade
for
direct consideration in the government decision-making process.
  • US/EU MRA Matejic, Mirko
    • Re: US/EU MRA Richard C. Towner

Reply via email to