treg  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: E1 pinout kkeegan
  • Re: E1 pinout Pete Van Raalte
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• Conformity Assessment seminar ron_pickard
  • Re: Conformity Assessment seminar Richard Haynes
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected] Victor L. Boersma
• RATED VOLTAGE UL1950 Larry Barnette
  • Re: RATED VOLTAGE UL1950 Robert Johnson
  • Re: RATED VOLTAGE UL1950 Kaan_Gregersen
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Bailin Ma" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• PBX Message Waiting Indication Lubeski, Paul
• Exchange voltages. Alan Booth
  • Re: Exchange voltages. Joe . Montes
• RE: Grounding of screen room Bailin Ma
  • RE: Grounding of screen room ed . price
• Bellcore OSMINE Dwight Hunnicutt
• Re: HP spect. anal. 8558B Scott Roleson
• HP spect. anal. 8558B/182T PostOgFjarskiptast: hjalmar arnason
  • Re: HP spect. anal. 8558B/182T ed . price
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [Juan Pedro Peña <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• SAFETY REQUIREMENT OF POTS PORT Aaron Bui
  • Re: SAFETY REQUIREMENT OF POTS PORT JPR3
• SASO LUSA, BILL
• Japanese Ring Gen Freq Pete Van Raalte
  • Re: Japanese Ring Gen Freq Christopher Saleem
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• Free Standards from ETSI Gary GORTON
• Re: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [V Gary GORTON
• German Return Loss - Thank You Mel Pedersen
• [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: German Return Loss, V.90]] Petra Bergermann
• ETSI PRI Multirate Oliver Sampson
• Betr.: German Return Loss, V.90 sypli
• German Return Loss, V.90 Mel Pedersen
  • RE: German Return Loss, V.90 Marc Decre
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Shane Patterson
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Ted Warren
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Duane J. Marcroft
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 kd
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Steve Wallace
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 dguy
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Duane J. Marcroft
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Gary GORTON
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Duane J. Marcroft
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: German Return Loss, V.90 Gary GORTON
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected] Victor L. Boersma
• Search for a special capacitor for a PCMCIA MODEM Petra Bergermann
• Search for special capacitors for a PCMCIA MODEM Petra Bergermann
• NEC 800-4 Query ron_pickard
• CISPR 11 CONDUCTED EMISSION FORMULA? MSundstrom
  • RE: CISPR 11 CONDUCTED EMISSION FORMULA? John Pratti
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] Victor L. Boersma
• Telephone Tools & Mags Pete Van Raalte
  • Re: Telephone Tools & Mags Mike Donnelly
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [Leslie Baker <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• New Phone # at FCC labs Grant . Pinto
  • Re: New Phone # at FCC labs ValErwin
  • Re: New Phone # at FCC labs Scottbarr
• GR1089 mvaldman
  • Re: GR1089 Douglas L McKean
  • Re: GR1089 Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: GR1089 Lfresearch
  • Re: GR1089 ron_pickard
• SSA Matejic, Mirko
  • Re: SSA Art Michael
  • Re: SSA Mark Briggs
  • RE: SSA Matejic, Mirko
  • Re: SSA Paul J Smith
• cellular phone supply system mvaldman
  • RE:cellular phone supply system Edward Eszlari
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Allan G. Carr" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• Re : CSE I 23-10 belayed reply Jean-Claude Hévin
• Can I use my US modem in Sweden? HMellberg
• USA Today Article, September 17th, 1998 Kate MacLean
• OATS and ANSI C63.7:1992 PostOgFjarskiptast: hjalmar arnason
  • Re: OATS and ANSI C63.7:1992 ron_pickard
• Re: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [ron [email protected]] (fwd) ghojan
• CSE I 23-10 Steve Hudson
  • Re: CSE I 23-10 Jean-Claude Hévin
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
  • BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
  • BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
  • BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Joe_Dwyer"@inter-tel.com] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• How can I use the V.8 and V.8bis command in Rockwell modem ? Jeongmin Cho
• Query: US safety required for ITE? ron_pickard
  • RE: Query: US safety required for ITE? WOODS, RICHARD
  • RE: Query: US safety required for ITE? Peter Tarver
  • Re[2]: Query: US safety required for ITE? ron_pickard
• International Caller ID Standards Lubeski, Paul
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [Sushil Gour <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• ETSI Documents on the Web Ben Wrigley
• [no subject] dfitzger
• Connectors for 2&4-wire E&M interfaces Grant . Pinto
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["UMBDENSTOCK, DON" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• Phone, Fax or e-mail pmi
  • RE: Phone, Fax or e-mail Marc Decre
  • RE: Phone, Fax or e-mail McEwen Bernie-LBM022
  • RE: Phone, Fax or e-mail STEVEN MARGIS
  • RE: Phone, Fax or e-mail STEVEN MARGIS
• Cell Phone/PCS requirements in India Thomas N. Cokenias
  • re: Cell Phone/PCS requirements in India STEVEN MARGIS
  • RE: Cell Phone/PCS requirements in India Sushil Gour
• Article on testing caller ID Bill Lyons
  • re: Article on testing caller ID STEVEN MARGIS
  • RE: Article on testing caller ID Lubeski, Paul
• Response to "one mark discourse" by John Allen dfitzger
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [Peter Lugg <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["WOODS, RICHARD" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
  • BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["WOODS, RICHARD" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• RE: Agency approvals on components in CE dfitzger
  • RE: Agency approvals on components in CE Victor L. Boersma
  • RE: Agency approvals on components in CE Duane J. Marcroft
• OATS PostOgFjarskiptast: hjalmar arnason
  • RE: OATS WOODS, RICHARD
  • Re: OATS Peter Lugg
  • RE: OATS UMBDENSTOCK, DON
  • RE: OATS Lubeski, Paul
• Looking For Test Equipment. Chris_Olliffe
• Re: EU OJ's website for Chronological list of available journals Paul J Smith
• EU OJ's Richard Steele
  • Re: EU OJ's kd
  • Re: EU OJ's Volkhard Delfs
  • Re: EU OJ's Randolph Ivans
  • Re: EU OJ's Paul J Smith
  • Re: EU OJ's Richard Steele
  • Re: EU OJ's Victor L. Boersma
• ETSI Standards Chris Healy
  • ETSI Standards Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: ETSI Standards Allan G. Carr
  • Re: ETSI Standards PostOgFjarskiptast: hjalmar arnason
  • Re: ETSI Standards Victor L. Boersma
• Dallas/Fort Worth Texas IEEE EMC Society Meetings for 1998 - 1999 BUSHNELLME
• a-law/mu-law John Combs
  • a-law/mu-law John Combs
  • Re: a-law/mu-law Douglas Mckean
  • a-law/mu-law Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: a-law/mu-law Pete Van Raalte
  • Re: a-law/mu-law Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: a-law/mu-law John Combs
  • Re: a-law/mu-law Douglas Mckean
  • Re: a-law/mu-law Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: a-law/mu-law Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: a-law/mu-law John Combs
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Ian Chapman" <Ian.Cha Victor L. Boersma
  • Re: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Ian Chapman" <Ian.Cha Douglas L McKean
• RE: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Ia n Chapman" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jack Murphy
• RE: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [sbt [email protected]] (fwd) John Pratti
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• A law v U Law John Pearson
  • Re: A law v U Law Douglas L McKean
• Obtaining a copy of CTR-21 Peter McConaghy
  • Re: Obtaining a copy of CTR-21 Duane J. Marcroft
  • Re: Obtaining a copy of CTR-21 Ben Wrigley
  • Re: Obtaining a copy of CTR-21 paulrob
  • Re: Obtaining a copy of CTR-21 Chris Penney
• CTR21 In The News Scott Roleson
• Re: Filiz Eryilmaz
• [no subject] dfitzger
• Re: BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [stimac @bhsintl.com (BHS International)] (fwd) Paul J Smith
• US Robotics/3Com ... Douglas Mckean
• Y2K SRZIMMER
  • Re: Y2K Pete Van Raalte
  • Re: Y2K Pete Van Raalte
• CMOS Driver Chips. Chris_Olliffe
  • Re: CMOS Driver Chips. Lfresearch
  • re: CMOS Driver Chips. Laurence Richardson
• NEBS Conference in Tahoe. Jon D Curtis
• KTL Email Change Ben Wrigley
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Allen Tudor" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• Homemade Lightning and Power Cross Testers Jerry Martin
  • Re: Homemade Lightning and Power Cross Testers Graham Rae Dulmage
• RE: Plastics and CofC's Mel Pedersen
  • CEX Albert Gonzalez
• Re: Mexico and Brazil AUSTRALIAN REQUIREMENTS Reuben Medding
• Mexico and Brazil roger
  • Re: Mexico and Brazil Filiz Eryilmaz
• GSM MOU COLIN_MCGEECHAN
• Email at UL and elsewhere. Jon D Curtis
• Acceptance of non-NRTL test data Kate MacLean
  • Re: Clarification: Acceptance of non-NRTL test data Kate MacLean
  • re: Acceptance of non-NRTL test data Randolph Ivans
  • Re: Acceptance of non-NRTL test data Paul J Smith
  • Re: Acceptance of non-NRTL test data Stephen Williams ITS/QS-Box
• CTR21 national adoption kd
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from ["Overcash, Walter" <[email protected]>] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• BOUNCE [email protected]: Non-member submission from [[email protected]] (fwd) Jon D Curtis
• Saudi Arabian Standard Organization Pete Van Raalte
  • RE: Saudi Arabian Standard Organization Tuckner, Phil J.
  • Re[2]: Saudi Arabian Standard Organization ron_pickard
  • RE: Re[2]: Saudi Arabian Standard Organization Towner, Richard C.
  • RE: Re[2]: Saudi Arabian Standard Organization Pete Van Raalte
• CE marking vs. Annex ZB in EN60950 JPR3
  • SV: CE marking vs. Annex ZB in EN60950 roger
  • RE: CE marking vs. Annex ZB in EN60950 richard . payne
  • Re: Re[2]: CE marking vs. Annex ZB in EN60950 JPR3
  • Re[4]: CE marking vs. Annex ZB in EN60950 ron_pickard

• Earlier messages
• Later messages